A
COUNTRY STUDY: THE REPUBLIC OF ADYGEYA
POLICY OF POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION
FOR THE TITULAR NATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE LOCAL POLITICS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF ADYGEYA OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
BY
ZEYNEL A. BESLENEY*
Since the
re-establishment of the Russian state as a reformed asymmetric
federation, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, with the
acceptance of Federal Constitution of 1993, a number of ethno-republics
within it have come into limelight for the tensions within them
between the titular and non-titular nations, such as the Republics
of Bashkortostan, North Ossetia-Alania, Adygeya and Tuva.
The
language laws that put Russian and the language of the titular
nation of the republic concerned on equal footing or the laws
that are designed to lure members of the Diaspora of the titular
nation to settle in the homeland to tilt the balance of demography
to the advantage of the titular nation have created much controversy.
Among
all these cases, Adygeya has attracted the greatest attention
of the Russian national media as well as specialists in the
Russian Caucasus. A number of articles that appeared in the
Russian newspapers in the last few years that even accused the
republican government of conducting an "apartheid policy
" towards the Russian majority . (1)
This
paper is aimed to explore the local politics in the Republic
of Adygeya in the light of the local conditions of ethnic relations
as well as the nationality policy of the federal centre in the
last decade.
Part
I is to provide the necessary information on Adygeya and the
history of its titular nation, the Adyge. This is essential
if one wishes to understand the motives behind the strong desire
on the part of the Adyge intelligentsia elite to continue with
the Soviet 'policy of positive discrimination towards the titular
nation' within the local political and legal realms even after
the Soviet state collapsed.
Part
II is concerned with the contentious issues and the political
actors of the republican politics. In this regard, the role
of the nationalist organisations the Adyge Xase and the Union
of Slavs of Adygeya will be investigated.
In
the last part, the recent developments with regards to the forthcoming
presidential elections in Adygeya and Moscow's role in the future
of this republic and its multinational people.
PART
I: THE REPUBLIC OF ADYGEYA AND THE ADYGE
The
republic of Adygeya, extending from the foothills of the Caucasus
Mountains to the Kuban Plain in the Northern Caucasus, lies
landlocked in the middle of Krasnodar Krai (2).
Adygeya, which is a small republic with 7800km -land area, has
no borders with any other North Caucasian republics. According
to 1995 figures, the population of the republic is 541.000 of
whom 22 % are Adyge. The Russians and the other Eastern Slavs
who make up 68 % of the population are in the absolute majority
in Adygeya(3)
, making the republic demographically the most "Russianized"
national unit of the whole Northern Caucasus. However, there
are around 40.000 more Adyge living in the adjacent areas of
Krasnodar Krai, apart from their ethnic kin the Cherkess, the
Abaza and the Kabardians living further east.
Adygeya
was founded as an autonomous region in 1922 and until it was
upgraded to republican status in July 1991 it had been subordinate
to Krasnodar Krai. Because of their coexistence for more than
50 years within the same administrative unit, there are close
economical, cultural, historical and ethnic ties between Krasnodar
and Adygeya both for the ethnic Adyge and the Russians including
the local Cossack population.
The Northern Caucasus region as a whole is home to the poorest
republics of the Russian Federation. Economically, the republic
is one of the weakest among the Russian regions. In 1997, %
55.3 of the republican population was living below the poverty
line, which made Adygeya 8th lowest ranking in the Federation.(4)
With the current growth trend persisting, it will take15 to
30 years for Adygeya to reach the national average level of
per capita GRP (5)
. However, among all the national republics of the Northern
Caucasus, which has been for years the scene of ethnic conflicts,
social instability and constant military operations, Adygeya,
according to many socio-economical indicators, is the most economically
developed and stable republic. This is helped by the relative
political and social stability on the republican level.
The
Adyge are a subdivision of the Circassians along with the Cherkess
of Karachai-Cherkessia, the Kabardians of Kabardino-Balkaria
and the Shapsough of the Lazarevsk region along the Black Sea
Coast. The Circassian language, which is related to the Abkhaz
of Abkhazia and the Abaza of Karachai-Cherkessia, is part of
the Northwest Caucasian language family and native to the Northern
Caucasus.
The
Circassians, as did the Chechens and the Dagestani peoples of
Northeast Caucasus, fought with the tsarist Russian armies for
more than 30 years in the 19th Century. Only the fall of Circassia
in 1864 marked the end of the Caucasian War whose impact on
the region and its people is still felt.(6)
"It is impossible to over-emphasise the significance of
the Russian conquest in the history of Circassia. Beyond doubt,
it was the single most cataclysmic event that changed the destiny
of the nation and almost led to its extinction".(7)
The Russian conquest led to the exodus of almost % 90
of all Circassians to the Ottoman Empire. Today there is a Circassian
Diaspora of around 3 million people in Turkey and the Middle
East. Their land was colonised by the Cossacks and Russians
and other settlers and became modern Adygeya,
Krasnodar
and parts of Stavropol Krai. Today the bulk of the Slavic population
of Adygeya are the descendants of these colonists.
During
the Soviet rule, the Circassians, due to Stalin's 'social engineering
experiments', were divided into four categories as the Adyge,
Cherkess, Kabardian and the Shapsough, which were placed in
four different administrative units. "The historical injustice"
of being dispersed as a result of the Russian imperialism of
19th Century and being divided and isolated by the Soviet policies
became a powerful argument of the various Circassian nationalist
organisations across the Northwest Caucasus in the Glasnost
era. It is therefore not surprising that Adyge Xase, which has
been an influential actor in the republican politics since the
late 1980s, is one of the first nationalist organisations to
emerge in the Northern Caucasus.
PART II: REPUBLICAN POLITICS: 'MAJORITY OPPRESSED BY MINORITY'
The controversy surrounding the political developments in Adygeya
since the upgrading of its status to republic in 1991 centres
on the efforts of the Adyge intelligentsia to create conditions
of positive discrimination for the Adyge minority and its language,
which has long suffered from the imperialist conquest and colonisation
of the 19th Century, in opposition to the wishes of the public
organisations claiming to represent the interests of the Slavic
majority to have a parliamentarian democracy in its classical
form where the majority rules. In other words the question that
has arisen is that is the current picture of Adygeya a positive
discrimination of a marginalized native population in the context
of the post-Soviet Russian Federation or the political and economical
dominance of an ethnic minority, in a republic that bears its
name, over the majority?
To
find an answer to this question and also to be able to follow
the republican politics in Adygeya, one must first identify
the local political leadership and the other influential socio-political
organisations, such as the Adyge Xase and the Union of Slavs
of Adygeya, and what they stand for.
Aslan
Alievich Dzharimov, an ethnic Adyge, has been the president
of Adygeya since its becoming a national republic in 1991. He
had been the First Secretary of the Communist Party's Regional
Committee in Adygeya as well as being a People's Deputy of the
USSR between 1989-1991, representing Adygeya. He won two presidential
elections, in 1992 and 1997. In the 1997 elections, when he
competed against two other Adyge candidates, he gained 57.88
% of the valid votes. In the all-federation level politics,
he is known to have been a supporter of Our Home is Russia and
later the Unity Movement. He is a Soviet-era apparatchik as
the likes of Mintimer Shaimiev of Tatarstan and Murthaza Rakhimov
of Baskhortostan who after the collapse of the Soviet Union
have turned into moderate nationalist leaders who reigned in
the more radical nationalists within their own ranks but, nevertheless,
also challenged Moscow on the issues of the rights of the republics
vis-à-vis the Centre.
The
Adyge Xase as an organisation is an all-Circassian nationalist
movement with branches in the Republics of Karachai-Cherkessia,
Kabardino-Balkaria and the Shapsough populated areas of the
Krasnodar Krai. Although these branches are independent establishments,
they are nevertheless part of the wider Circassian umbrella
organisation the International Circassian Association (ICA),
whose declared aim is to protect the rights of the Circassians
wherever they live and to facilitate the return of the substantial
portion of the Circassian Diaspora to the Circassian inhabited
lands of the Northwest Caucasus to change the demographic structure
where the Circassians constitute the minority of the population.(8)
Although the Xase has lost considerable strength in Adygeya
and Kabardino-Balkaria, it still is a very powerful public movement
in the Republic of Karachai-Cherkessia, which it wants to break
up into separate Circassian and Karachai national units.
In
the early 1990s, the Adyge Xase was the most powerful opposition
movement to the leaderships of Dzharimov, whom radicals within
the Xase even labelled an enemy of the Adyge nation. (9)
However, once Adygeya was upgraded to republican status and
the rights of the Adyge as the titular nation were enshrined
in the republican constitution it became a staunch supporter
of the president and the status quo, to the extent that its
current chairmen Ruslan Peneshov has served in the successive
republican governments under Dzharimov's presidency. The organisation's
major objective is to keep the "positive discrimination"
for the Adyge secure and to attract the members of the large
Circassian Diaspora to Adygeya so that the Adyge can become
a majority in the republic.
The
Union of Slavs of Adygeya led by Boris Karataev and Nina Konovalova
was created in 1991 as a counter-balance to the Adyge Xase but
failed to gain much prominence.(10)
However in the early 1990s it categorically opposed the separation
of Adygeya from Krasnodar Krai and later the upgrading of its
status to a republic. At various times the Union advocated a
referendum on the return of the capitol City of the republic,
Maikop, which is overwhelmingly inhabited by Russians, to Krasnodar
Krai.
The
local branch of the Communist Party of Russia is another powerful
political force in Adygeya. It enjoys the majority in the republican
parliament and has two deputies in the federal state Duma. However,
its capacity in the local politics is limited and does not play
a major role.
Therefore,
the most contentious issues of the local politics from the point
of the Adyge intelligentsia can be summarised as:
"
The reluctance of the Union of the Slavs of Adygeya to recognise
the special status of the Adyge as the titular nation of the
republic which is the result of the recognition by the Lenin's
nationality policy of the tragic history of imperialism in the
Northern Caucasus,
"
The way the Russian media is portraying Adygeya is feeding the
'unsubstantiated' belief that is prevalent among the Russian
nationalists in the Northern Caucasus that all Circassians are
'conspiring' to create a 'Greater Circassia' uniting all the
Circassian inhabitant lands of Adygeya, Karachai-Cherkessia,
Kabardino-Balkaria and parts of Krasnodar Krai, thus forming
a [Muslim] greenbelt to surround the traditional Orthodox Slav
regions of Krasnodar and Stavropol. Then, they argue, the Circassians
will force the Russians and the peoples of other nationalities
to leave the republic , (11)
"
The fact that the main base of support for the Union of Slavs
is the local Cossacks makes the Adyge population uneasy about
the real intention of this organisation. The calls made by some
populist Russian politicians for the revival of the traditional
Cossack paramilitary forces, which are seen by the Adyge as
the embodiment of the oppression and the colonisation of the
last century by the tsarist Russia, are spreading fear among
the Adyge that this would lead to the creation of an authoritarian
society. (12)
However,
the issues from the Union of Slavs' point of view are
"
The election law, which dictates that all presidential candidates
must be fluent in the both official languages of the republic,
namely Adyge and Russian , (13)
"
The way the electoral constituencies are defined (which ensures
parity between the Russians and the minority Adyge),
"
The local immigration law that grants special settlement and
taxation rights to the persons of Circassian descent who desires
to settle in Adygeya while the residency rights of the people
of non-Adyge origin are tightly controlled and restricted,
"
The dominance of the Adyge elite in the republican economy that
was facilitated by the privatisation programs carried out by
the Adyge leadership as part of the economic reforms in the
early 1990s.
CONCLUSION
Despite
all the criticism and the cries of 'apartheid' regime, the Republic
of Adygeya has been an island of peace and relative stability
in a region that has in the last decade seen armed conflicts
in Chechnya, Abkhazia, North Ossetia, Daghestan, ethnic unrest
in Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachai-Cherkessia as well as economic
recession and a sharp increase in criminal activities affecting
the whole federation.
In
this paper, I have tried to draw attention to not what has happened
in Adygeya after the collapse of the Soviet Union but, on the
contrary, to what has not occurred, which was expected to occur,
that no major rallies or protest meetings have occurred in Adygeya
for years and that there has been no talk of the Adyge Xase
or the Union of Slavs creating paramilitary forces in preparation
for a 'coming' conflict. Instead, multicultural dance and art
festivals attended by the representatives of the Russians, the
Adyge and the other peoples of the Northern Caucasus have been
organised. President Dzharimov's every public speech has been
addressed to "the multinational people of the Republic
of Adygeya" not to the Adyge people, which is a sign of
a new republican identity emerging against all the odds.(14)
Traditionally, the Adyge and the Russians have shared the governmental
posts. The current Prime Minister and the chairman of the upper
wing of the local parliament are Russians.
This
new republican identity beyond one's ethnic affiliation seems
to have given way to a new voting pattern in the last presidential
election that took place on 13 January 2002. For the first time
since the foundation of the republic of Adygeya, candidates
of different nationalities participated in the presidential
election regardless of their knowledge of Adyge language, which
was the result of the suspension, for ten years, of the language
law which requires the president to be bilingual in Adyge and
the Russian.
The
local Adyge businessmen Khazret Sovmen, who owns gold mines
in Krasnoyarsk in Siberia and is known across the whole federation
as a philanthropist, won the election, as was expected, by taking
68 % of the valid votes by securing the support of the bulk
of the population, Russian and Adyge alike, who have been suffering
from the economic hardship for years and have been ready to
lay their hopes not on his ethnic background but on his managerial
skills, to govern the republic. In this race, the old foes,
the incumbent president Aslan Dzharimov and the leader of the
Union of Slavs Nina Konovalova received 9% and 8% of the vote
respectively.
Although no official statement has been made by Moscow about
the result of the election, the outcome must also have been
welcomed by Putin administration for he is more than happy to
see Aslan Dzharimov, just as Ruslan Aushev of Inghushetia, leave
his post as Dzharimov, like Aushev, has long been an outspoken
critic of Putin's re-centralising policies and an advocate of
the rights of the republics vis-à-vis the centre.
Although
the success of Sovmen will evidently surpass the ethnic boundaries
for the near future, in the long term, however, Moscow should
take into account the local conditions of Northern Caucasus,
especially the case of the Adyge's ethnic kin, the Abkhaz and
the war in Abkhazia that has set an example of how a titular
nation, that is made minority in its own country, can resist
outside pressure to abolish the positive discrimination for
the titular nation.
Only
by allowing to remain intact the above mentioned language law,
that has a great symbolic meaning for the Adyge, and thus offering
a incentive to the local Russians, who want to hold governmental
posts, to learn the language of the titular nation- a decision
which may even pave the way in the end for an Adyge speaker
of Russian majority to become president-can Moscow ensure that
Adygeya can put aside its problems of ethnic nature and instead
concentrate on implementing economic reforms and creating a
democratic, prosperous society where the particularities of
the Adyge are respected and taken into consideration.
(1)
See Liz Fuller, 'Adygeya's Slavic Majority Protests Discrimination'
in RFE/RL Caucasus Report, 16 April 2001, Vol.16, www.rferl.org.
See also Nana Kitsmarishvili's article, 'Prizrak Natsionalizma
Bradit Po Evrope' in Novaya Gazeta on 4 May 2000, no: 17 or
Valery Sharov, 'Adygeyskii Paritet' in Novaya Gazeta, 11 January
2000,no.1. The TV programme "Itogy2" by Yelena Mashuk
was broadcast on Russian National TV, NTV 2 April 2000.
(2)
Anna Matveeva, The North Caucasus: Russia's Fragile Borderland,
The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 1999,
p.82
(3) These 1995 population figures are taken from Robertson's
Russia &Eurasia Facts &Figures Annual, volume 22,1997,
pp 20-23 as cited in Anna Matveeva, The North Caucasus: Russia's
Fragile Borderland, page 82.
(4)
Regiony Rossii, Moscow: Situatsionny tsentr pri Presidente RF,
FAPSI, 1997 as cited in Matveeva, p.82.
(5) Alexei M. Lavrov and Alexei G. Lakushkin, The Fiscal Structure
of the Russian Federation: Financial Flows Between the Center
and the Regions, East West Institute, New York, London, 1999,
p.xxiii.
(6) Matveeva, page 5.
(7) Amjad Jaimoukha, The Circassians: A Handbook, Curzon Press,
London, 2001, page 12.
(8) The ICA's own web site, which is in need of updating, can
be viewed at http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Park/1170/ListE.htm
(9)
Aslan Dzharimov, Ozerklikten Cumhuriyete Adigey (From Autonomy
to Republic: Adygeya), in Turkish, Turkiye Isbirligi ve Kalkinma
Ajansi, 1996, Ankara/Turkey, page 16. In this book, Dzharimov
re-evaluates the political events of the early 1990s in Adygeya.
(10) Matveeva, page 83.
(11) See the article titled "What is there
in the ICA's Dossier" published in the Russian Language
bulletin of the Union Of Slavs, Za Kubanye in Adygeya in its
October 2000 edition, No: 21. This argument is especially powerful
in Krasnodar where Zhrinovskii's Liberal Democrat Party of Russia
and the Communist Party are the leading political forces. In
1998 when the Adyge authorities proposed a land exchange plan
to the Krasnodar authorities, that would have brought into the
jurisdiction of Adygeya some areas of Krasnodar Krai inhabited
by another Circassian subgroup the Shapsough, whose national
autonomy had been abolished in 1945, in exchange for some arable
areas, it was the local LDPR that put up a fierce resistance
to this proposal arguing that it would be the first step for
the creation of 'Greater Circassia'.
(12) Valery Tishkov, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict In
And After The Soviet Union: The Mind Aflame, Sage Publications,
London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 1997, page236.
(13) This law, which was in force for the first two presidential
elections, has now been suspended for ten years to provide the
opportunity for the potential candidates to learn Adyge language.
(14) Among the Dzharimov's statements, see especially
the one titled From Millennium to Millennium, which was published
in the Adyge language newspaper Adyge Mak on 29 December 2000
where he evaluates the past, current political situation in
the republic.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
1)
Alla Chirikova and Natalia Lapina, Political Power and Political
Stability in the Russian Regions in Contemporary Russian Politics,
edited by Archie T. Brown, p. 384-397, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2001
2)
Alla Chirikova and Natalia Lapina, Regional Elite: A Quiet Revolution
on a Russian Scale, Center For Security Studies and Conflict
Research, Zurich, 2001
3)
Alexei M. Lavrov and Alexei G. Lakushkin, The Fiscal Structure
of the Russian Federation: Financial Flows Between the Center
and the Regions, East West Institute, New York, London, 1999
4)
Amjad Jaimoukha, The Circassians: A Handbook, Curzon Publishing,
London, 2001
5)
Andrei S. Makarchev, Islands of Globalisation: Regional Russia
and the Outside World, Center For Security Studies and Conflict
Research, Zurich, 2000
6)
Anna Matveeva, The North Caucasus: Russia's Fragile Borderland,
The Royal Institute Of International Affairs, London, 1999
7)
Aslan Dzharimov, Ozerklikten Cumhuriyete Adigey (From Autonomy
to Republic: Adygeya), in Turkish, Turkiye Isbirligi ve Kalkinma
Ajansi, Ankara/Turkey, 1996
8)
Liz Fuller, 'Adygeya's Slavic Majority Protests Discrimination'
in RFE/RL Caucasus Report, 16 April 2001, Vol.16
9)
Martin Nicholson, Towards a Russia of the Regions, Oxford University
Press, New York, 1999
10)
Nana Kitsmarishvili,'Prizrak Natsionalizma Bradit Po Evrope'
in Novaya Gazeta on 4 May 2000, no: 17
11)
Paul Henze, Circassian Resistance to Russia in The North Caucasus
Barrier, page 62-111, C. Hurst & Co., London, 1992
12)
Robert V. Daniels, Democracy and Federalism in the Former Soviet
Union and the Russian Federation in Beyond the Monolith: The
Emergence of Regionalism in Post-Soviet Russia, page 233-244,
The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, 1997
13)
Tamila Lankina, Local Government and the Ethnic and Social Activism
in Russia in the Contemporary Russian Politics, page 398-414,
Oxford University Press, New York, 2001
14)
Valery Sharov,'Adygeyskii Paritet' in Novaya Gazeta, 11 January
2000,no. 1.
15)
Valery Tishkov, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict In And After
The Soviet Union: The Mind Aflame, Sage Publications, London,
Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 1997
*BY
ZEYNEL A. BESLENEY
MA in RUSSIAN STUDIES
The School of Slavonic Studies,
University College London
Editor's Note: Our thanks are due to Mr.Besler for his kind
permission to publish his article on our web site
© 2002 Agency Caucasus